Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 |
141. Faction Warfare: Moving Forward..... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Karl Planck wrote: Your presumption is slanted. Yes, most ppl on the cal/gal front don't care for plexes. The minnies are crazy about them and amarr does them here and there. However, you are neglecting WHY no one likes to do them. There is...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.10.21 14:39:00
|
142. Faction Warfare: Moving Forward..... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
On a different note: FW item Requests: I want my militia to roll out onto the field completely pimped out in Faction Navy Gear! Improve some gear. 1. Make lower tier navy faction cruisers worth owning. (Exeqeror Navy Issue, etc..). 2. Increase sp...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.10.21 14:29:00
|
143. Faction Warfare: Moving Forward..... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Grath Telkin wrote: I'm all about opening up where they can be built, but unfortunately EVE has never been about a level playing field Of course EvE isn't a level playing field, and I'm glad you agree that you ought to be able to build Super ...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.10.21 13:46:00
|
144. Faction Warfare: Moving Forward..... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
sYnc Vir wrote: [list] Removal of all FW Missions. Turn the plexing system into the LP rewards. Currently a skilled up toon can get 30K LP for 1 mission that takes them about 90 seconds to complete. This is stupid. Turn Major plexes into 40...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.10.21 13:36:00
|
145. Faction Warfare: Moving Forward..... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Grath Telkin wrote: X Gallentius wrote: If you can't build it in low sec, you shouldn't be able to field it in low sec. Sorry no, there are capitals in high sec, so.... Amamake is our home until CCP make 0.0 worth living in, right now i...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.10.21 03:03:00
|
146. Faction Warfare: Moving Forward..... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If you can't build it in low sec, you shouldn't be able to field it in low sec. So let us build supers in low sec and remove this artificial constraint on being able to invade 0.0 space (You have to pay off null sec 0.0 Sov Blob to purchase equi...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.10.20 23:55:00
|
147. Gallente - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kai Lae wrote: 1. Since this would make afterburners equally effective on all types of ships, how does this address the ability - or lack of ability - for gallente blaster ships to catch, fire, and kill hostile targets? I'm not seeing it. 2. ...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.10.20 23:07:00
|
148. Are hybrids inherently broken and impossible to fix? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alara IonStorm wrote: Don't make fast enough it to kill Vagabonds, make it so it can run down and OBLITERATE! Hurricanes, Harbinger's non speed bonused HAC's with overwhelming Blaster DPS. Blasters also fail "because of neuted". Make a dei...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.10.20 22:00:00
|
149. Are hybrids inherently broken and impossible to fix? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Blasters: Increase tracking significantly. If we catch it, we should be able to kill it. (tackle can already kite a blaster hull, they don't need to be able to get under its guns) Afterall it's very hard to catch things, and when we do they burn o...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.10.20 21:56:00
|
150. What is wrong with hybrids? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Blasters: If we catch it, we should kill it. That doesn't happen because blaster tracking at its intended range sucks. The drawbacks to blasters are too numerous to count (fitting reqs too steep, vulnerable to neuts, tds, yada, yada, yada..), but ...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.10.20 21:48:00
|
151. Faction Warfare: Moving Forward..... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Karl Planck wrote: You forgot one, fix the post dt plexing. Agreed, but I figured if it were low hanging fruit then it would have been plucked by now. We've been complaining about it since FW began. w.r.t Allowing enemies in high sec: 1. d...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.10.20 20:28:00
|
152. Faction Warfare: Moving Forward..... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Comments from a FW guy who participates in occupancy war, fights, and missions. Remember this: The BEST thing about FW is the free war dec. Opening up the free war dec to willing participants (joining FW) leads to great low sec fights without wo...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.10.20 19:26:00
|
153. Gallente - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Why should blaster hulls be as fast as Minmatar hulls? Because when blaster hulls get in range they'll just get neuted anyways.....
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.10.20 02:56:00
|
154. Gallente - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Everything points to Gallente hulls needing to use afterburners to work correctly. Active Tanking: Active tanking is more feasible on ships fit with afterburners. Close range tracking: AB-fit ships are harder to track at close range. Vu...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.10.18 13:47:00
|
155. Gallente - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pattern Clarc wrote: @X Gallentius - Although blasters will track better, that mainly helps dealing with ships your own size. The true boost will be the increased drone bay on blaster boats, large enough for an additional set of light drones w...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.10.14 18:30:00
|
156. Gallente - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Just let my medium blasters **** frigs that come too close. Frigs can already point me at 20km with near immunity (blasters suck at max point range), and they can outrun my drones forever (and pop them one by one too). Frigs should therefore die i...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.10.10 16:19:00
|
157. Is the eve community stupid, FAT and ******ed? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The introduction of station containers and rookie ships has ruined the Eve economy, just like POS mods and other items created out of "thin air" used to ruin the economy before PI. In any case, it certainly seems like there's plenty of room for ...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.06.30 07:20:00
|
158. Garmon's humble two isk on this matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Raimo Originally by: Plus 1 Originally by: Laedy Originally by: X Gallentius lol fail. If he were truly successful in Eve he'd be sporting a monocle. Yeah look at that Minigin dude there's a ...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.06.28 13:27:00
|
159. Eve Online in Crisis - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Keyanu The Pay To Win was something the community made up in fear. CCP have never stated they are going to do it so why should they comment on pure speculation. CCP propoganda department must be staffed with a bunch of i...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.06.28 13:06:00
|
160. [CONFESSION] Why did I purchase a monocle? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I heard Chuck Norris has one monocle - which means John Turbefield has two monocles 'cause he's twice as good as Chuck Norris, but John Turbefield would never buy monocles! Accc***k!!! The universe cannot handle such fundamental contadictions! ...
- by X Gallentius - at 2011.06.27 21:11:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |